According to the semantic evaluation perspective ( Hsu et al., 1989), shorter RL is associated with higher scores on social desirability scales, because it is easier to evaluate the meaning of an item than to evaluate that item according to autobiographic information, which involves recalling episodes to direct the answer.
Nevertheless, over the decades, divergent perspectives regarding RL and faking have emerged in the literature, and empirical research has produced mixed findings.
Beginning in the 1990s, RL was proposed more insistently as an additional method of testing the validity of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI Hathaway and McKinley, 1951), together with the MMPI’s own validity scales (L-r, F-r, and K-r). (1972) suggested that response latency (RL i.e., the amount of time elapsed between an item’s presentation and a subject’s response) could be used to detect dissimulation tendencies. Over the past years, psychologists have searched for methods to identify the occurrence of this phenomenon ( Fluckinger et al., 2008). For this reason, detection of malingering represents an area of considerable interest for researchers of individual differences ( Holden et al., 2001). In any assessment setting, a subject completing a personality inventory can answer truthfully or not, according to his or her goal. Specifically, fake-good behavior involves presenting the self in a more positive manner, relative to honest self-evaluation ( Maricuţoiu and Sârbescu, 2016). (2012) defined faking as an intentional and deliberate behavior that helps an individual achieve personal goals. Limitations include the sample size and gender bias.Ī common concern for those using self-report inventories of personality and psychopathology is the susceptibility of such inventories to malingering or faking ( Anastasi, 1988 Holden et al., 1992). Completion times for the first and second parts of the MMPI-2-RF and T-scores for the K-r scale seemed to predict malingering.Ĭonclusion: The speeded condition seemed to bring out the malingerers. The Fake groups also scored higher on the VAS Tension subscale. The speeded condition increased T-scores in the L-r and K-r scales but decreased T-scores in some of the RC scales. Results: Significant differences were found between the four groups, and particularly between the Honest and Fake-Good groups in terms of test completion time and the L-r and K-r scales. To test the hypotheses, MANOVAs and binomial logistic regressions were run.
#MMPI 2 PSYCHOLOGICAL TEST WITH 567 QUESTIONS SOFTWARE#
A software version of the MMPI-2-RF and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were administered. Subjects were randomly assigned to four groups: Honesty Speeded, Fake-Good Speeded, Honesty Un-Speeded, and Fake-Good Un-Speeded. Materials and Methods: The sample was comprised of 135 subjects ( M = 26.64 SD = 1.88 years old), all of whom were graduates (having completed at least 17 years of instruction), male, and Caucasian. Finally, the impact of the speeded condition in malingering was assessed. Our hypotheses were that: the Fake-Good Speeded group would obtain a different completion time show higher RLs than the Honesty Speeded Group in the validity scales show higher T-Scores in the L-r and K-r scales and lower T-scores in the F-r and RC scales and show higher levels of tension and fatigue. We compared RLs and T-scores on the MMPI-2-RF (validity and restructured clinical scales) in four experimental groups. We explored this relationship further, aiming to add further insight into the reliability of self-report measures. d’Annunzio”, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italyīackground and Purpose: Research on the relationship between response latency (RL) and faking in self-administered testing scenarios have generated contradictory findings. 2Department of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, University “G.1Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.Verrocchio 2, Cristina Mazza 1, Daniela Marchetti 2, Franco Burla 1, Maria E.
0 kommentar(er)
